Legal Opinion

Board of Road & Revenue Commissioners v. Collins

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 15, 1956No. 36448PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

1. In every suit there must be a legal entity as the real plaintiff, either a natural or artificial person, or a quasi-artificial person, such as a partnership; and where a suit is brought in a name which is neither, it is a nullity, and there is nothing to amend by. The designation of a party plaintiff as “Board of Road and Revenue Commissioners of Candler County, Georgia” falls within the above ruling. Smith v. Commissioners of Roads and Revenue of Glynn County, 198 Ga. 322 (1) (31 S. E. 2d 648).

2. “A party plaintiff in error is essential to the prosecution of a writ of error, and where no…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Arnett v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  2. Smith v. Commissioners of Roads & RevenueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Swift v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Bennett v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  5. Humber v. DixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. BOARD OF ROAD & REVENUE COMMISSIONERS OF CANDLER COUNTY v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API