Legal Opinion

Swift v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 7, 1897PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Practice in Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

In the bill of exceptions, the case is entitled thus : “Mrs. M. A. Swift et al., caveators, plaintiffs in error, v. W. W. Thomas and Arthur E. Griffeth, propounders, defendants in error and it is stated that “ the above stated case ” came on to be tried at the April term, 1896, of the superior court of Clarke county, and on the 29th of April, 1896, “ the same being a caveat to the probate of the will of Y. L. G. Harris; it having been regularly appealed according to law from the court of ordinary, of Clarke county also that “ said M. A. Swift and each and all of the other caveators present…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beall v. Surviving Executors of FoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  2. Cameron v. SheppardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Orr v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Ramey v. O'ByrneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Dawson v. Equitable Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Joiner v. SingletarySupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API