Legal Opinion

Arnett v. Board of Commissioners

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 27, 1885PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Actions. Counties. Constitutional Law. Amendment. Before Judge IIansell. Decatur Superior Court. November Adjourned Term, 1884 Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Justice.

When this case was called for trial in the superior court, a motion was made to dismiss it because it was improp*783erly brought against the board of commissioners of Decatur county,—that the suit was not maintainable against the defendants, as such commissioners; and the court having intimated an intention to sustain the m'otion, plaintiff then asked leave to amend, first, by striking from the declaration the words “Board of commissioners.Of Decatur county,” so that the suit should proceed against the persons named ■ as such county commissioners individually; and, secondly, by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bennett v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  2. Powell v. County of MuscogeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  3. Gill v. TisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  4. Tiller v. SpradleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1869

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Glaze v. BogleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Birdsey v. Wesleyan CollegeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  3. McGinnis v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  4. Henry v. MeansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Guhl v. TuggleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API