Smith v. Commissioners of Roads & Revenue
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The question here presented is whether a plaintiff, denominated as “Commissioners of Roads and Revenue of Glynn County, Georgia, the governing authority of Glynn County, a political subdivision of the State of Georgia,” is such an entity as can maintain a suit in court. This court is fully committed to the proposition that no suit can be lawfully prosecuted save in the name of a plaintiff having a legal entity, either as a natural or an artificial person. In every suit brought in this State, there must be a real plaintiff and a real…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Dalton Marble WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Bailey v. McAlpinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Eslinger v. HerndonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Barbour v. Albany Lodge, No. 24Supreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Hudgins Contracting Co. v. RedmondSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Block v. Voyager Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Patterson v. Duron Paints of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Orange County Trust Company v. Estate of Abe TakowskyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Russell v. O'DONNELLCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Corley v. Crompton-Highland Mills Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1946
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.