Legal Opinion
Blumenthal v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 16, 1946No. 11232PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONE, Circuit Judge.
Appellants appeal from a conviction before a jury upon an indictment charging them, in one count, with the crime of conspiring to violate the Emergency Price Control Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq., and Regulations by wilfully selling whisky at over-ceiling prices. Omitting formalities, the indictment reads as follows:
“That Harry Blumenthal, Louis Abel, Lawrence B. Goldsmith, Samuel S. Weiss, and Albert Feigenbaum, (hereinafter called ‘said-defendants’) at a time and place to said Grand Jurors unknown, did knowingly, wilfully, unlawfully, corruptly, and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Enrico Campanale and Donald Matthews, United States of America v. Mike GrancichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Donald Anderson and Jack SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Steiner v. 20th Century-Fox Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.