Legal Opinion

Biddle v. Smith

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

FROM WASHINGTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Washington County, —Hon. I-Ial H. Haynes, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

A judgment rendered against W. S. Smith for $3,344.92 in the chancery court at Johnson City was declared an equitable vendor’s lien upon a lot conveyed by A. B. Biddle and W. S. Smith to the Standard Automatic Mine Door Company. Smith did not appeal, but from the decree declaring a lien upon the lot, the company appealed to the court of civil appeals. While pending, appellant-moved a transfer to this court, insisting that the constitutionality of chapter 31, Acts First Extra Session of 1913, is involved, denuding the court of civil appeals of jurisdiction. The cause was transferred, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Merrick Et Al. v. N. W. Halsey & Company Et Al., and the Weis Fibre Container CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. State v. Gopher Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Stewart v. BradyIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Edward v. IoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dunham v. OttingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Kneeland v. EmertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Western Air Lines, Inc. v. SobieskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Gillis v. Pan American Western Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  5. In re MacNamaraNew York Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API