Legal Opinion

In re MacNamara

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonohue, J.

The petitioner has moved to vacate a subpoena served by the Attorney-General of the State of New York commanding the applicant to appear before him to testify and to produce certain papers in regard to the practices of the Wall Street Iconoclast and George Graham Rice in the sale of securities in and from the State of New York. The issue raised by this motion is the constitutionality of section 352 of the General Business Law (as amd. by Laws of 1926, chap. 617). It also brings into question incidentally section 359 of that act (as amd. by Laws of 1926, chap. 617).

The validity of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Merrick Et Al. v. N. W. Halsey & Company Et Al., and the Weis Fibre Container CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Stewart v. BradyIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Matter of DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Ottinger v. State Civil Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. Cedar Park Concrete Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  2. Carlisle v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  3. 160 West 87th Street Corp. v. LefkowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  4. In re Di BrizziNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State Ex Rel. Veigel v. Hardstone Brick Co. of Little Falls, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API