Legal Opinion

Matthiesen v. Continental Casualty Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1995No. 93-0453PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is a review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals affirming a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County, Honorable Michael J. Barron, Judge, that granted summary judgment against Mr. Mark A. Matthiesen in favor of American Family Mutual Insurance Company, Mr. Matthiesen's underinsured motorist (UIM) insurer. The sole issue on review is whether the reducing clauses in the two American Family UIM policies issued to Matthiesen apply. Because Matthiesen had two separate UIM policies, we hold that the reducing clauses are invalid as contrary to sec. 631.43(1), Stats.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Tahtinen v. MSI InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Wood v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Kaun v. Industrial Fire & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Kuhn v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin v. HillsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hull v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Dowhower v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Badger Mutual Insurance v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API