Hartel v. Dishman
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Chief Justice.
This appeal is by writ of error, but the parties will be referred to as appellants and appellee.
On the 15th day of April, 1936, Stuart R. Smith deeded to appellee, H. E. Dishman, an undivided interest in the Claiborne West league in Orange county, warranted in the deed “to be not less than an undivided 330 acre interest.” Mr. Smith held title to a part of the land conveyed by him to appel-lee by, through, ánd under Mrs. Martha A. Van Auken, who conveyed to him her interest in the land as an “undivided interest.”
On the 17th day of August, 1927, at that time owning the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marshburn v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1924
- Marshburn v. StewartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Paddock v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Ater v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Anderson v. BarnwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hartel v. DishmanTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Goldenrod Finance Co. v. WareCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Goldenrod Finance Co. v. WareCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940