Anderson v. Barnwell
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
(after stating the case as above).
There is duly and fully presented for decision the points in view, in effect, that those .defendants claiming a right and interest to oil, by lease and deed, in the 5<Pacre tract may not in the circumstances proven take or obtain the right or legal estate in the oil interests in the land as against the plaintiffs having a recorded legal title either (1) as purchasers of the property without notice for value, or (2) by estoppel. The defendant Donald W. Moore and like named defendants claim interest and rights, not in the surface, hut in the oil and minerals…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eylar v. EylarTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Inge v. CainTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- John T. Hardie & Co. v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Teague v. SwaseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Gaston & Thomas v. DashiellTexas Supreme Court · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Richland Hills v. BertelsenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- First Savings & Loan Ass'n of El Paso v. AvilaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Anderson v. BrawleyTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Hartel v. DishmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.