Legal Opinion
United States v. Juan Faulks
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 18, 2000No. 98-2061PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Chief Judge.
This is a second sentencing appeal. The panel in the first appeal reversed the initial sentence and remanded for proceedings on defendant Juan Faulks’s application for a downward departure for extraordinary acceptance of responsibility. The District Court thereupon held a full hearing and rejected the request for a downward departure in a written opinion. This appeal requires us to decide whether Faulks’s sentencing must be returned to the District Court for a third time because that court, which imposed the new sentence by a written judgment, did so in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. Richard O. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Anthony Ruggiano, Jr. v. R.M. Reish, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Dwayne StevensCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Robert Tequan Nappi, A/K/A Quan Nappi, A/K/A Keith Wade, Robert Tequan NappiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Melendez-SantanaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.