Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Tequan Nappi, A/K/A Quan Nappi, A/K/A Keith Wade, Robert Tequan Nappi

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 21, 2001No. 99-6126PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

RENDE LL, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Appellant Robert Tequan Nappi (“Nap-pi”) challenges his federal sentence of 105 months’ imprisonment, claiming that it was improperly predicated on factual information contained in a state presentence report (“state PSI”) that was not presented to him or his attorney prior to, or during, the sentencing hearing, and on which he had no opportunity to comment prior to the District Court’s imposing sentence. He argues that Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(c)(1) required the District Court to provide him with the state PSI prior to…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Stewart v. ErwinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Robert U. SymeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. HoffeckerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. VowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Donald DavenportCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API