Legal Opinion
People v. Gentner, Inc.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 10, 2004No. Docket No. 249559PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonofrio, J.
Plaintiff appeals by leave granted a circuit court order reversing the district court’s finding that defendant was responsible for the civil infraction of overweight vehicle, MCL 257.722(1)(b), dismissing the complaint, and ordering that all fines and costs be refunded to defendant. Because we find that the “reason to believe” requirement of MCL 257.724(1) is not an element that must be proven in a prosecution for the civil infraction of overweight vehicle, MCL 257.722, we reverse.
SUBSTANTIVE FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The facts of this case are not in dispute. On November 6, 2002, Michigan…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Herald Co. v. City of Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Gladych v. New Family Homes, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Department of Natural Resources v. SeamanMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. FergusonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. CainMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. Gentner, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Long Lake Township v. Todd MaxonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
- People of Michigan v. Braden Lee ReidMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
- People of Michigan v. James Lee PowellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.