Rollins v. . Rogers
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, O. J.
Mandamus is available against a board of county commissioners only to compel tbe board to do something which it is its duty to do without it. The writ confers no new authority. The party seeking it must have a clear legal right to demand it, and the board must be under a legal obligation to perform the act sought to be enforced. Neither of these prerequisites has been shown in the instant case. Powers v. Asheville, 203 N. C., 2, 164 S. E., 324; Person v. Doughton, 186 N. C., 723, 120 S. E., 481. The writ was improvidently granted.
Reversed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Person v. DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Person v. . DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Powers v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harris v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- White v. . Comrs. of JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Board of Managers of the James Walker Memorial Hospital v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Mears v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Board of Education v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.