Legal Opinion

Otero v. Sandoval

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1956No. 5996PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

Appellant instituted this action to quiet title and from an adverse judgment, he appeals. The complaint alleges that he is the owner of the N%NE^4 and E^NWj^i Section 32, Township 13 North, Range 9 West, McKinley County. The answer generally denies the allegations of the complaint. By further answer and counterclaim, appellees seek to quiet the title in themselves, relying principally on adverse possession under color of title and res judicata. Issue was joined by reply.

On October 10, 1944, appellant instituted an action to quiet title to the premises in which Ramon…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Morris v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Bindley v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  3. Pueblo De Taos v. ArchuletaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  4. Manby v. VoorheesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Davis v. SavageNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Liddy v. LamoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Smith v. WalcottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Stoll v. DowNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Sales v. Samac Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1965
  5. Cagan v. Village of Angel FireNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API