Legal Opinion
Pueblo De Taos v. Archuleta
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 10, 1933No. 645, 732PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
These eases present the epilogue of the controversy between the Pueblo of Taos and tho non-Indian settlers who claim title to many tracts of land formerly owned by the Pueblo in communal title. The Pueblo Lands Act (43 Stat. 636 [25 USCA § 331 note]) provided elaborate machinery for the determination of the many disputes that arose over Pueblo titles after the decision of the Sandoval and Candelaria Cases (231 U. S. 28, 34 S. Ct. 1, 58 L. Ed. 107; 271 U. S. 432, 46 S. Ct. 561, 70 L. Ed. 1023). The Pueblo Lands Board was charged with the duty of investigating such…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Hughes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- United States v. CandelariaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lord v. VeazieSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Gardner v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Saul Munoz Sibaja, Rafaela Arrieta Porra v. Dow Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Alexander v. HallDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- Carnegie Nat. Bank v. City of Wolf PointCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Madden v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- Gloria Parker v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.