Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Esparza v. Paxson

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided May 26, 1993No. 08-93-00141-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARAJAS, Justice.

This is an original proceeding seeking to mandamus the Honorable Samuel Paxson, Judge of the 210th Judicial District Court of El Paso, County, Texas, Respondent. Relator, Jaime Esparza, District Attorney for the 34th Judicial District seeks mandamus to direct Respondent to correct a judgment of conviction to properly reflect a jury’s affirmative finding of the use of a deadly weapon. We conditionally grant the writ of mandamus.

In order to obtain relief through writ of mandamus, a relator must establish that (1) no other adequate remedy at law is available and (2) that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Dickens v. Court of Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial District of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Ex Parte PoeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Ex Parte DoppsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. State Ex Rel. Vance v. RouttCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  2. Brooks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
  3. McCallum v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  4. Campos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1996
  5. Tyra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API