Legal Opinion

Dickens v. Court of Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial District of Texas

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 25, 1987No. 69490PublishedCited by 246 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAMPBELL, Judge.

This is an original mandamus proceeding brought by the Judge of the 297th District Court in Tarrant County (relator),1 to contest the issuance, by the Court of Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial District (respondent), of a writ of mandamus directing relator to allow discovery of a complainant’s videotaped statement. Relator argues that the act of permitting discovery of evidence is a discretionary act of a trial judge reviewable only on appeal and, therefore, not the proper subject of a writ of mandamus. We agree and will grant relief.

I

James Dean Reynolds is a…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Curry v. GrayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. RepublicBank Dallas, N.A. v. Interkal, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Quinones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Simmons v. ArnimTexas Supreme Court · 1920

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by246 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Appeals at TexarkanaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Ater v. Eighth Court of AppealsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. In Re McAfee, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
  4. State Ex Rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth DistrictCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  5. Kinnamon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

241 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API