Legal Opinion

Brooks v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided June 2, 1995No. 06-94-00154-CRPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

In a jury trial Flake Woody Brooks was convicted of aggravated assault and assessed punishment of ten years’ confinement, probated. On appeal he complains of ineffective assistance of counsel, sufficiency of the evidence, and the trial court’s exclusion of evidence that a witness was biased because of a financial stake in the trial’s outcome. The State in a cross-point contends that the trial court erred in not entering an affirmative finding that Brooks used a deadly weapon in the assault. We reform the judgment to reflect the jury’s affirmative deadly weapon…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Ingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Stone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Thieu Quang Bui v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
  2. Jefferson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  3. McCallum v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  4. Dickson v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  5. Hopper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API