Legal Opinion

McCallum v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided January 27, 2010No. 04-08-00844-CRPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by:

MARIALYN BARNARD, Justice.

A jury found appellant Michael McCal-lum guilty of criminally negligent homicide, and assessed punishment at confinement for eighteen years. McCallum does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence; instead, he raises three procedural complaints: the trial court erred in (1) denying his request for an accomplice-witness instruction in the jury charge, (2) admitting evidence indicating McCallum was a member of the Aryan Brotherhood, and (8) assessing punishment beyond the prescribed statutory maximum. He contends alternatively that if we hold his…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Asberry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  5. Rylander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Duran v. .StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Davion Griffin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
  3. United States v. Jose Sanchez-SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  4. Alex Morris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  5. Allen Maurice Little v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API