Legal Opinion

Ray Motor Co. v. Stanyan

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 22, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMorrill, J.

The first action is to recover the sale price of a motor car known as a Mitchell Roadster; the verdict was for defendant. The second action is to recover the amount of payments made by plaintiff on the price of the same car; the verdict was for plaintiff. The actions were tried together before the jury, and on general motions for new trials are before us upon a single record.

On December 24, 1920, Mr. Stanyan entered into a written contract with the Ray Motor Company to purchase “One Mitchell Car, Model F 3 Passenger Body Type, Roadster; .... and to accept delivery on or about May 1st, 1921”;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boles v. MerrillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. Hallwood Cash Register Co. v. LufkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Foutty v. Chalmax Sales Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API