Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lanham v. DeWine

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 2013No. 2012-0203PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an action for a writ of mandamus to compel respondents, Attorney General Michael DeWine and his office (collectively, “the attorney general’s office”), to provide unredacted copies of records relating to the claim that State Representative Danny R. Bubp simultaneously held the public offices of state representative and mayor’s court magistrate. Because relator, Kent Lanham, has not established his entitlement to the requested extraordinary relief, we deny the writ.

Facts

{¶ 2} Danny R. Bubp was a state representative for the 88th house district in the General Assembly. In 2009 and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Spectrum Systems International v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Corrigan v. SeminatoreOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Mollie Ann Dunn v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Jones-KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Pike Cty. Coroner's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Salemi v. Cleveland Metroparks (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Salemi v. Cleveland MetroparksOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Hicks v. Fraley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State ex rel. Ames v. Dublikar, Beck, Wiley & MathewsOhio Supreme Court · 2022

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API