Legal Opinion

Maynard v. American Railway Express Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 20, 1922No. 13272PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. The judgment of the superior court, in sustaining a certiorari from the municipal court of Macon and in thus granting a new trial to the plaintiff in certiorari, will be affirmed where the judgment of the municipal court (sitting as court and jury) is not absolutely demanded by the evidence, without any adjudication by this court with respect to the reason assigned by the superior-court judge as the basis for his action. Nickajack Milling &c. Co. v. International Vegetable Oil Co., 26 Ga. App. 473 (106 S. E. 300); Van Giesen v. Queen Insurance Co., 132 Ga. 515 (64 S. E. 456); Ballenger v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Great American Co-Operative Fire Ass'n v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  2. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Cowart v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  4. Van Giesen v. Queen InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  5. Nickajack Milling & Grain Co. v. International Vegetable Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Haas & Howell v. GodbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Dixon v. Cassels Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Jefferson v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  4. Daniell & Beutell v. McReeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Chalker v. RaleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API