Chalker v. Raley
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The only question argued here is, is the verdict of the jury authorized under the law and evidence. While we have set forth the testimony as contained in the special ground, we do not agree that such is the only evidence which the jury were authorized to consider in fixing the amount of their verdict. It is our opinion that the jury, in arriving at the verdict, were authorized to take into consideration all the facts and circumstances relating to the killing of the dog, and were not confined merely to the conclusions of the witnesses who testified on the subject. Indeed, in a case of this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Baker v. Richmond City Mill WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. TompkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Kraft v. Rowland & RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Georgia Northern Railway Co. v. BattleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Sweat v. SweatSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Maloy v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Imperial Investment Co. v. Modernization Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Southern v. Cobb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Housing Authority of City of Decatur v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Fulton County v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.