Van Giesen v. Queen Insurance
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action upon insurance policy. Before Judge Charlton. Chat-ham superior court. March 27, 1908.
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
1. This being the first grant of a new trial, and the verdict not having been demanded absolutely by the evidence, this court, without undertaking to make any adjudication with respect to the reason assigned by the trial judge as the basis of his action, will affirm the judgment. Civil Code, §5585; Cox v. Grady, ante, 368 (64 S. E. 262); McCain v. College Park, 112 Ga. 701 (37 S. E. 971); Brantley Co. v. Bank of Waycross, Id. 532 (37 S. E. 737); Harvey y. Bowles, Id. 363 (37 S. E. 363); Weinkle v. Brunswick R. Co., 107 Ga. 367 (33 S. E. 471); Macon Street R. Co. v. Jones, 116 Ga. 351 (42 S.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weinkle & Sons v. Brunswick & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Cox v. GradySupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Macon Consolidated Street Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Watson v. Equitable Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- McCain v. College ParkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Carr v. CarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Cowart v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Fairburn & Atlanta Railway & Electric Co. v. LathamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Lee v. LovelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Murray v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.