Legal Opinion
Daniell & Beutell v. McRee
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 23, 1923No. 14737PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
This was an action for the recovery of the reasonable value of services of the plaintiffs as architects, alleged to have been performed for and accepted by the defendant, who denied that the services had been authorized or accepted to the extent claimed, and contested also the reasonableness of the charge. The value of the services was not fixed *211by any contract. A verdict was found for the plaintiffs, but for a sum less than the amount sued for. A certiorari sued out by the defendant was*granted, and the plaintiffs excepted. Held:
Decided November 23, 1923. Herman B. Bvins, for plaintiffs.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baker v. Richmond City Mill WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Jennings v. StriplingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Shaw v. ProbascoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Finleyson v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Maynard v. American Railway Express Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hoard v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Kraft v. Rowland & RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Imperial Investment Co. v. Modernization Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Johnson v. Lipscomb-Weyman-Chapman Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Folds v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.