Legal Opinion

Painter v. Painter

California Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1894No. 15,310PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; F. W. Lawlor, Judge. Action by Caroline A. Painter and E. B. Dallam, executors of the will of Jerome B. Painter, deceased, against Theodore P. Painter and J. Milton Painter, for an accounting. From a judgment for plaintiffs and an order denying a new trial defendants appeal. Reversed.

1Opinion of the Court

VANCLIEF, C.

This is an action by the executors of the will of Jerome B. Painter, deceased, to compel an accounting and settlement of the affairs of the partnership firm of Painter & Co., of which the deceased was a member and Theodore P. Painter was the surviving partner.

The business of the partnership was that of manuf acturing and selling printing-presses, type and other materials, and the publication of an annual directory, and other incidental business. The partnership was originally formed in 1859, when it was composed of the three brothers—Jerome B., J. Milton, and Theodore P. Painter,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Griggs v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Steele v. KinkleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
  4. Paxton v. BoyceTexas Supreme Court · 1846
  5. Estate of KidderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Vangel v. VangelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Rowell v. RowellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Mervyn Investment Co. v. BiberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Nuland v. PruynCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Moseley v. MoseleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API