Legal Opinion

Bernheimer v. First Nat. Bank of Beverly Hills

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 20, 1935No. 7592PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.

The First National Bank of Beverly Hills, appellee, has been and is now a national banking association organized under the laws of the United States and authorized to do a trust business under the laws of the United States and of the state of California. Said bank, up to and including June 3, .1932, operated and conducted a general banking business in the city of Beverly Hills, Cal. Said bank was authorized to act as trustee, executor, administrator, and in other fiduciary capacities agreeable to the laws of the state of California, pursuant to which it conducted a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Lippitt v. Thames Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  3. Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. Leonard Watch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Bassett v. City Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Bachrach v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Mademoiselle Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Mademoiselle of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API