Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Mademoiselle of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 6, 1967No. 21375PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JERTBERG, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from "summary judgment in favor of appellees, Mademoiselle of California (hereinafter Mademoiselle) and Union Bank (hereinafter Union). Appellant, as receiver of San Francisco National Bank (hereinafter SFNB), brought this declaratory judgment action to determine 1) whether Mademoiselle is entitled to set off its deposit in account with SFNB against a note due SFNB, and if so 2) whether Union, as holder of an 80% participation interest in that note, is entitled to a preferred claim for 80% of the set-off. We affirm as to Mademoiselle and reverse as to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. American Surety Co. v. Bethlehem National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Jennings v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. People v. Cal. Safe Deposit & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Becker v. SeymourSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Mademoiselle Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API