Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Mademoiselle Of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 6, 1967No. 21375PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
379 F.2d 660
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver of San
Francisco National Bank, Appellant,
v.
MADEMOISELLE OF CALIFORNIA, a Co-Partnership, Edward Wieger
and Ruth Carlson, Individually and as Co-Partners doing
business under the firm name and style of Mademoiselle of
California, Nancy Wieger, Wendell R. Carlson, and Union
Bank, a Corporation, Appellees.
No. 21375.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
June 6, 1967.
Charles A. Legge, Alan I. Kaplan, Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon, San Francisco, Cal., John F. Lee, Leslie H. Fisher, FDIC, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
LeRoy Hersh,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- American Surety Co. v. Bethlehem National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Jennings v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- People v. Cal. Safe Deposit & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Becker v. SeymourSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Penn Square Bank, N.A. v. Myron J. PalermoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Interfirst Bank Abilene, N.A., Cross-Appellant v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of Ranchlander National Bank, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Central States Resources, Corp. v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Hibernia National Bank v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.