Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Pacific Greyhound Lines

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1946No. Civ. 7218PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

Plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment rendered pursuant to the verdict of a jury in favor of Pacific Greyhound Lines and Rodney 0. Nelson, the driver of the bus, in a suit for personal injuries received by paid passengers thereof as the result of a collision with a Ford automobile driven by the codefendant, Boyd. A verdict was also returned and a judgment rendered against Boyd for the sum of $15,000 and costs. The defendant Boyd has not appealed. The only issue on appeal is the alleged error of the trial court in instructing the jury in regard to the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur that it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Leet v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Michener v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Scarborough v. UrgoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Crooks v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Cody v. Market St. Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dodge v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Johnson v. MarquisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Price v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. James v. American BuslinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Barone v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API