Legal Opinion

In Re C.S.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 1, 2002No. 00-FS-1153PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WASHINGTON, Associate Judge:

In this juvenile delinquency case,1 C.S. asserts that because the trial court entered a disposition2 on August 30, 2000, prior to *309the completion of an Individualized Education Program (IEP),3 the determination of the trial court should be vacated. Specifically, C.S. argues that an IEP was required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA);4 the spirit of the juvenile justice laws;5 and the trial court’s order, making the disposition of C.S.’s case improper prior to the completion of an IEP. Because none of these reasons compel the trial court to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re T. L. J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. In re J. J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Alfred Eugene Rice v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. Petties v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In the Matter of K.T.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Shaw v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  3. In re B.D.S.D.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  4. In re B.WCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  5. Blackman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API