Legal Opinion

In re T. L. J.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1980No. Nos. 13928, 79-979PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Associate Judge:

Appellant, convicted in juvenile court and committed to the custody of the District of Columbia Social Rehabilitation Administration, challenges two court orders granting one-year extensions of the commitment.1 As grounds for reversal, appellant urges that the trial court abused its discretion and misconstrued its statutory authority in *156granting the extensions.2 We find that the Corporation Counsel, representing the custodial institution and the “public interest,” may move to extend the period of commitment of a juvenile when the extension is necessary for his or her…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Helvering v. Morgan's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Foster v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Southern Garment Mfrs. Ass'n v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  5. United States v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Office of People's Counsel v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. In re L.J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. D.C. Appleseed Center for Law & Justice, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Insurance, Securities, & BankingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Francis v. Recycling Solutions, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Appeal of A.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API