In re B.D.S.D.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.
Appellant was adjudicated as a juvenile for engaging in delinquent conduct by committing the offense of prostitution. In two issues, she challenges the adjudication of the offense, arguing (1) her right to due process was violated when the State failed to investigate whether she was "caused by any means to commit prostitution"; and (2) as a result of the State's failure to conduct such an investigation, adjudication of the offense "offends public policy notions that child victims of sexual exploitation must be protected." We affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Subaru of America, Inc. v. David McDavid Nissan, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- National Liability & Fire Insurance Co. v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital v. AgborTexas Supreme Court · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re I.F.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- In re D.L.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- In Re Bdsd, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- In the Matter of D. L. A. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2026
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.