Bush v. Weed Lumber Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The appeal is from a judgment of non-suit. The nature of the action may be seen from the following allegations of the complaint: “That on and prior to the 9th day of June, 1919, plaintiff was employed by said Weed Lumber Company to bore a well for said Company on its premises near Camp 3, at Morrison, in the County of Siskiyou, State of California; that on said 9th day of June, 1919, while plaintiff was employed as aforesaid, his said well boring outfit broke down and while waiting for same to be repaired, plaintiff, at the solicitation of C. W. Murphy, general superintendent for said Weed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Means v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Schmidt v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Kennedy v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stockwell v. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Lindholm v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- McGregor v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Bush v. Weed Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
- Brown v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.