Ciavarelli v. Zimmerman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a foreclosure action. Appellants contend there existed a factual issue which precluded summary judgment. We do not agree and affirm.
The facts and inferences therefrom considered in the light most favorable to appellants are as follows. On July 22, 1977 appellants executed a new promissory note and deed of trust in order to settle a pending trustee sale that was the result of appellants’ failure to pay on a prior promissory note and deed of trust. The new note required monthly payments and both the note and deed of trust…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Graf v. Hope Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Bisno v. SaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Arizona Coffee Shops, Inc. v. Phoenix Downtown Parking Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Domus Realty Corp. v. 3440 Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1943
- Domus Realty Corp. v. 3440 Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Frei v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. RamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Vonk v. DunnArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO. v. RICECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2020
- Dorn v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.