Legal Opinion

Derechinsky v. Epstein

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 20, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill in this cause was filed for the foreclosure of a purchase-money mortgage given by Louis and Dora Epstein to the complainant. The mortgage contained the usual thirty days' interest and ninety days' tax, water rent and assessment clauses. The taxes and water rents remaining unpaid for more than ninety days after they became due, the complainant says that this gave him a right to file his bill before the due date mentioned in the bond and mortgage.

Prior to the filing of the bill the mortgage had been assigned to the defendant Blumenthal as collateral security for the payment of a debt…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bergman v. FortescueNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
  2. Norton v. WarnerNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  3. De Groot v. McCotterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1868
  4. Leipziger v. Van SaunNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1902
  5. Arkenburgh v. Lakeside Residence Ass'nNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Pennington Trap Rock Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  2. K.S.S. Realty Co. v. OstroffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  3. Lettieri v. MistrettaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  4. Warren v. New Jersey Zinc Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  5. Brown v. Royal Battery Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API