Wadleigh v. Higgins
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
POMEROY, Justice.
That Forrest Wadleigh is totally disabled is established by the Industrial Accident Commissoner’s finding “that Mr. Wadleigh is totally disabled.” The finding of fact has substantial competent evidence and reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom to support it. This being so, we must and do accept total disability as established fact. Willette v. Statler Tissue Corp., Me., 331 A.2d 365 (1975); MacLeod v. Great Northern Paper Co., Me., 268 A.2d 488 (1970).
After hearing before the Industrial Accident Commission, the Commissioner made finding that 90% of the employee’s total…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Murray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Soucy v. Fraser Paper, LimitedSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- Gagnon's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
- Willette v. Statler Tissue Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- Goldthwaite v. Sheraton RestaurantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bearce v. FMC Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Poitras v. R. E. Glidden Body Shop, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Johnson v. SD Warren, Div. of Scott PaperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Upham v. Van Baalen Pacific Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Warren v. H.T. Winters Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.