Legal Opinion
Upham v. Van Baalen Pacific Corp.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided October 14, 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODFREY, Justice.
Employee Raymond F. Upham appeals from a pro forma judgment affirming a Workers’ Compensation Commission decree which dismissed both his petition for award of compensation and his petition for determination of extent of permanent impairment. The Commission dismissed the petitions on the grounds that they were not timely filed. We affirm the pro forma judgment.
On June 7, 1972, Upham suffered a work-related injury to his right knee and lower back during a fall at his place of employment, Van Baalen Pacific Corporation. Mr. Upham’s job consisted of cutting large bolts of cloth…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pino v. Maplewood Packing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- Ross v. Oxford Paper CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Soucy v. Fraser Paper, LimitedSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- Theriault v. Walsh Construction Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Bradbury v. General Foods CorporationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Erickson v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Coy v. Dover Corp./Norris DivisionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Rines v. ScottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Jensen v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Erickson v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.