Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Kevill
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided February 7, 1938PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The respondents in this proceeding have moved for bills of particulars respecting the allegations of the petition in this discovery proceeding and the petitioner has launched the not unfamiliar counter attack of applying for an examination before trial of the respondents for the purpose of informing himself concerning the matters in respect of which particularization is demanded. The only answers are general denials.
In this situation the respondents urge the authority of Matter of Carney (119 Misc. 104; affd., 206 App. Div. 734) as demonstrating the impropriety of the counter…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re the Estate of HeinzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- In Re the Estate of AkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- In re Van BurenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- In re NutrizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- In re the Estate of EnrightNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re the Estate of KusterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
- In re the Estate of HilliardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- In re the Estate of RosenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
- In re the Estate of LukasNew York Surrogate's Court · 1974
- In re the Estate of UngerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.