In re the Estate of Unger
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
Under section 316 of the Surrogate’s Court Act the provisions of the Civil Practice Act are made applicable to pro*953ceedings in Surrogates’ Courts in the absence of express or “ plainly implied ” contrary intent. Nothing within this connotation is to be found in the Surrogate’s Court Act respecting replies, wherefore section 274 of the Civil Practice Act is clearly applicable and accords a discretionary right to the court to direct the filing of a reply where an answer contains new matter constituting a defense by way of avoidance. The answer in this proceeding complies with this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Estate of KevillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Estate of WorkNew York Surrogate's Court · 1912
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of FooteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- In re the Final Accounting of KauffmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961