Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Rosen

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 14, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

So far as the diligence of counsel and the independent research of the court has disclosed, the situation revealed in this proceeding is unprecedented.

The present petitioning administratrix appears to have become enmeshed in a procedural difficulty which possesses no direct relation to the merits of the controversy of whether or not Harry Rosen should deliver certain specified assets to her.

The petitioner secured an order in discovery proceedings on June 26, 1939, for the examination of Harry Rosen and examined him at length on its return. No facts were elicited which tended to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of AkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Buffalo City Cemetery v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of EhlertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  4. In Re the Accounting of EhlertNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. In re Van BurenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of RyanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1970
  2. O'Shaughnessy v. John J. Barrett, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Fromer v. ShientagNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. In re the Construction of the Will of PaschkesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
  5. In re the Estate of GrayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API