Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Lukas

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 2, 1974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Evans Y. Brewster, S.

The motion by the respondents in this discovery proceeding, which is still in the inquisitorial stage, for an order compelling disclosure by the petitioner is denied for the reasons and on the authorities cited below.

The petitioner alleges essentially that cash which was deposited by the decedent with the respondents over a nine-year *25period, as well as cash and other assets of the decedent which were transferred hy respondents to others, in excess of the sum of $200,000 in value, should now he returned to the decedent’s estate. In support of this allegation the petitioner…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of KevillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  2. In re the Estate of KusterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
  3. Ossandon v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Helen Charash v. Oberlin CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. In re EshagianNew York Surrogate's Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API