Ross v. Wellman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
This action was brought to quiet plaintiff’s title to a tract of land. Defendant answered denying the allegations of the complaint, except that he admitted that he claimed title to the land.
The answer then proceeds to aver that plaintiff is, and had for a long time been, the wife of one A. Ross. That on the 27th of June, 1890, A. Ross was the owner of the land in controversy, and was indebted to the defendant. That at the time said A. Ross had no other property subject to execution. That on the day last named said A. Ross made a conveyance of the property *3to one John Campbell, for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Briswalter v. PalomaresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hart v. ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Casey v. LeggettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- State ex rel. Deck v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Hanscome-James-Winship v. AingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Severn v. RuhdeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.