Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Burke

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 30, 1918No. 9253PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Seminole County; J. W-. Bolen, Judge. Action by J. E. Burke against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, motion for new trial overruled, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

In this action the defendant in error seeks recovery of $40,000 damages from the plaintiff in error for personal injuries suffered by him. Hereinafter the parties will be styled as they were in the trial court.

The defendant answered and set up that consideration of the sum of $2,500 paid to the plaintiff by the defendant had compromised said claim and released and forever discharged the defendant from any and all liability for all claims, for all injuries including those that may hereafter develop, as well as those apparent, and attached to said answer, as an exhibit,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
  2. Holcomb v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Bullitt v. FarrarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HambrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  5. Hedin v. Minneapolis Medical & Surgical InstituteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. CauthenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Beatrice Creamery Co. v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Tulsa City Lines, Inc. v. MainsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. PetersonArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Davis v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API