Legal Opinion
Tulsa City Lines, Inc. v. Mains
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 8, 1939No. 1843PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
May Mains instituted this suit against Tulsa City Lines, Inc., hereinafter called the company, and Doyle Layton, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as the result of negligence in the operation on a street in Tulsa, Oklahoma, of a bus owned by the company, on which plaintiff was a passenger for hire. Layton was not served with process. By answer, the company pleaded unavoidable accident, contributory negligence, and compromise, settlement, and written release of liability. By reply, plaintiff admitted the execution of the written…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ruhlin v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. CauthenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Beatrice Creamery Co. v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Scheer v. Rockne Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Olen F. Featherstone and Martha Featherstone v. Max BarashCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Graham v. Atchison. T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Sitchon v. American Export Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- American Home Assurance Company and Westminster Insurance Managers, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- State of Utah George D. Fehr Earl E. Fehr Joe Lyon, Jr. And United Western Minerals Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.