Legal Opinion

Hedin v. Minneapolis Medical & Surgical Institute

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 6, 1895No. Nos. 9387-(206)PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Hicks, J., denying their separate motions for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLINS, J;

This is an action for deceit. Defendant institute is a corporation, while defendant Lawrence is its president, the physician and surgeon in charge, and the person with whom plaintiff’ dealt, and to whom he paid the sum of $500 for medical treatment, which sum he alleges was obtained by defendants through false and fraudulent representations to him that certain injuries from which he was then suffering were curable, and that at the institute they could and would cure him for that amount of money. No question has been made as to the sufficiency of the complaint. Plaintiff had a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gordon v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Hicks v. StevensIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Eaton v. WinnieMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Robbins v. Barton Bros.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1892

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Spiess v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
  5. Clements Auto Co. v. Service Bureau Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API