Legal Opinion
Fishman v. Fishman
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 9, 1981No. Civ. 60162PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DALSIMER, J. *
A “Judgment Pursuant to 1710.25 CCP” was entered in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant in the superior court. Defendant’s motion to vacate that judgment was granted by the trial court and the action was dismissed. Thereafter a motion to reconsider was filed by the plaintiff and that motion was denied. It is from the order vacating the judgment and from the denial of the motion for reconsideration that plaintiff has perfected her appeal to this court.
Facts
The parties to this litigation who were once husband and wife have over the course of almost 10 years engaged…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tripp v. SwoapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- City of Costa Mesa v. McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Jones v. TysonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Tom Thumb Glove Co. v. Kwang-Wei HanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Building Material & Construction Teamsters' Union v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- McCallum v. McCallumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Liebow v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- In Re Marriage of NewportCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Neuman v. BarberaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.