Legal Opinion
Smith v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 13, 1954No. Civ. 19836PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal by defendant from an order in a proceeding brought under the “Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Law.” (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1650-1681.) Defendant also appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Since the latter order is nonappealable the appeal therefrom will be dismissed.
The “Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Law” was enacted in 1951. (Stats. 1951, ch. 694.) It was amended in 1953. (Stats. 1953, ch. 1290.) This proceeding is governed by the law as originally enacted. The support law is designed to enable a dependent in one state to secure money for support from…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Stebbins v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Daly v. DalySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Proctor v. SachnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Daly v. DalyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.