McCallum v. McCallum
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EAGLESON, J.
We hold that a 1983 application under the Sister State Money Judgment Act (Code Civ. Proc., § 1710.10 et seq.) 1 to enforce three New York money judgments for spousal and child support resulted in a final judgment which is not subject to collateral attack under the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (§ 1650 et seq.). We therefore reverse the trial court’s order denying the motion of appellant James McCallum (Husband) to vacate registration of a foreign support order.
Facts and Procedural History
As part of their marital dissolution proceedings, Husband and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Swinerton & Walberg Co. v. City of Inglewood-Los Angeles County Civic Center AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- McGlothlen v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jessen v. Mentor Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Honda Motor Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Froyd v. CookDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1988
- HUSCHER v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Volonte v. Domo, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2023
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.